What impact, if
any, will on-going reflections have on the quality of the culminating semester
assignment?
Diane Klemme
Project Summary
Learning Question: What impact, if any, will on-going reflections have on the quality of the culminating semester assignment?
Classroom observations are an imbedded activity in many teacher training programs. This activity takes place outside the classroom and often times has modest follow-up. Students are expected to ³put-in-the-hours² and write a summary report. I want to explore if on-going reporting about classroom observations will impact the final summative report.
Students in the FCSE 201, Presentation Strategies for Family and Consumer Sciences Education (FCSE) class do classroom observations as a requirement for the course. Half the class participants will be randomly selected write a brief response after each observation (6 total responses, will not be graded)
First Observations will occur the week of February 14th- 18th, 2005
Second Observations will occur the week of April 11-15th, 2005.
Observations will occur at the
To assure that the investigator is not influenced by prior knowledge of group members this will be a blind study. I have had most of the students in the FCSE 101 course. The investigator's student worker will be the only person to know the compositions of the two groups. Students will be instructed not to discuss the questions with the investigator. The student worker will randomly select the groups, input the data, send the reflection questions and monitors the completion of the 6 brief reflections. After final class grades are submitted the investigator will be informed of the groups' compositions.
Data
Collection:
1) All students will take a ³pre-test² (Appendix A)
2) Half the class will write 6 brief responses to reflection questions (listed in key learning activity section) via email.
3) Students' responses will be returned to respondent prior to completing final report.
4) All students will take ³post-test² (same as pre-test but reword directions)
5) All students will complete summative report.
Data Analysis:
a) Comparison of the two groups pre-test/post-test scores
b) Comparison of the two group final summative report scores
c) Feedback from class evaluation
Course Context
FCSE 201 is a prerequisite for FCSE 301, FCSE Curriculum, and FCSE 360, FCSE Evaluation . The course is based on competencies defined as necessary for individuals who desire to become involved in a teaching/learning environment such as a school. This course follows FCSE 101, Introduction to FCSE and for most FCSE students this course provides their first observation of FCSE teachers at a middle school and high school setting.
These observations have been purposefully planned to occur at the
The classroom observations provide students with a ³real world² look at life in the classroom and the observations can either strengthens their commitment to the profession or provide motive to change majors. Course objectives addressed by the classroom observations include:
¤ demonstrate skill in utilizing methods of creating and maintaining positive physical, psychological and social teaching/learning environments for various family and consumer settings
¤ actively participate in a minimum of 12 hours in Family and Consumer Education Class rooms under the supervision of a Family and Consumer Education teacher.
In addition, class participants are introduced to writing lesson plans, various teaching strategies and students are required to develop a lesson plan and present it to the class. The course content is very important as participants will hone their lesson writing and presentation techniques over the next couple semesters during classes and student teaching.
Key Learning
Activity
The key learning activity for this project was the introduction of 6 on-going reflections questions (listed below) related to the classroom observations and the observation report requirements (listed below)
Reflection Questions:
6. Tell me something you learned about students today?
FCSE 201 Journal Report Assignment
(20pts)
Include: 1) Observation Logs Forms (Appendix C)
2) A brief description of the teaching /learning situation including:
3) A reflective evaluation of what you learned about yourself in your
future role teacher including:
á How you think the classroom make-up influences teaching activities and lesson plan development
Key Findings
Comparison of Pre/Post
means of Reflection Group and Non-Reflection Group
Paired-Sample T-test
|
Question |
Pre-Test |
Post-test |
||
|
|
Average
Difference in means |
t
and Sig (2-tail) |
Average
Difference in means |
t
and Sig (2-tail) |
|
1 |
.6667 |
.184 |
.2500 |
.391 |
|
2 |
-.3333 |
.667 |
1.250 |
.194 |
|
3 |
-.3333 |
.667 |
1.000 |
.182 |
|
4 |
.3333 |
.742 |
.7500 |
.215 |
|
5 |
.3333 |
.742 |
.7500 |
.319 |
|
6 |
-.3333 |
.742 |
1.250 |
.080 |
|
7 |
.3333 |
.742 |
1.500 |
.014* |
|
8 |
0 |
0 |
.5000 |
.182 |
|
9 |
-.3333 |
.423 |
.7500 |
.215 |
|
10 |
.6667 |
.529 |
.7500 |
.319 |
|
11 |
.6667 |
.529 |
.2500 |
.391 |
|
12 |
-.3333 |
.667 |
0 |
0 |
|
13 |
-.3333 |
.667 |
0 |
0 |
|
14 |
1.000 |
.225 |
1.000 |
.308 |
|
15 |
.6667 |
.423 |
.7500 |
.444 |
|
16 |
.3333 |
.667 |
-.2500 |
.391 |
*significance at
*p<.05
Student means scores on
final summative report (20pts)
Reflection Group Non-Reflection
Group
17.25 18.30 sig(2-tailed) .736
Course Evaluations I
had intended to look at the students course evaluation but due to the move from
the Home Economics Building I' still trying to locate them.
Learning Question: What impact, if any, will on-going reflections have on the quality of the culminating semester assignment?
I
would be very hesitant to suggest this project's findings as decisive because
the class enrollment was 10 students.
The sample is really too small to provide reliable data. My student worker selected the groups
and based on the groups'
compositions, I'm not surprised the non-reflection group members received
higher scores on the final report. When I looked at the composition, I noticed
the non-reflection group included several academically successful students. My
student worker had no way of knowing the students' background and this could be
a contributing factor in the final score.
From
the data, I might conclude that the
students in the reflection group did have a better understanding of high school
students (Question # 7 on the survey) and perhaps the reflection questions
contributed to this fact; but I'm not positive. I had anticipated the on-going reflections
would increase the final scores, but they did not. The non-reflection group members
received higher scores. What did
surprise me was that the reflection
group students scored the majority of the post-test questions higher than the
non-reflection group students. This
data suggest that the reflection group felt they gained a good deal from the
observation experience.
Perhaps,
the reflection questions provided the students an opportunity to personally
process the experience throughout the semester and thus they felt they gained
more out of the experience. This
also could an example of the ³Hawthorne effect² the students have a positive
effect toward the experience because they are involved in the study and in some
way feel they are receiving ³special² attention.
The
limited data from this study suggests that
focusing more attention on the observation experience lead to students
feeling they gained more from the experience even if their final reports did not receive the highest marks. I can use this knowledge in the future as
I seek new ways to aid students in their attitudes toward observations
assignments.
Evidence of Student
Learning
Overall,
the final report scores reflected that students did gain from the observation experience
and are starting to personally process their role as a teacher. The cooperating teacher at the
middle school wrote me a brief note indicating that this was one of the best
group of students she has had the opportunity to evaluate.
Appendix A
FCSE 201 Classroom
Observation Experience
Directions: Please circle the response that best identifies you thoughts as to what you may gain from the classroom observations.
|
|
Very Helpful |
Somewhat Helpful |
Helpful |
A Little Helpful |
Not Helpful at all |
|
1. commitment to FCSE major |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
2. self-awareness of personal strengths |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
3. self-awareness of personal weaknesses |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
4. understanding of middle school curriculum |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
5. understanding of high school curriculum |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
6. understanding of middle school students |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
7. understanding of high school students |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
8. professionalism in work environment |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
9. understanding of various teaching techniques |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
10. identification of motivational technique use at middle school |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
11. identification of motivational technique use at high school |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
12. identification of evaluation techniques used at middle school |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
13. identification of evaluation techniques used at high school |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
14. understanding of classroom management at middle school |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
15. understanding of classroom management at high school |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
16. identify various types of learning environment |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Appendix B University of Wisconsin Stout
School of Education
Cooperating Teacher's
Assessment Form of Prestudent Teaching Experience
Students Name_________________________________ Observation
Dates # of Hours
Teacher's Name________________________________
______________ ________
School_______________________________________
______________ ________
School Address________________________________
______________ ________
________________________________ ______________ ________
________________________________ ______________ ________
Please rate the pre student teacher's performance by using
the following criteria:
|
NA-Not
applicable in this teaching situation |
1=
Unsatisfactory/not achieved |
2=
Emerging/achieved with limited degree |
|
Planning and Preparation
Elements Shows knowledge of content and pedagogy Shows knowledge of student
characteristics Shows some understanding of
instructional objectives The Classroom Environment Display respect and rapport Notices sensitivity to learning,
cultural, and racial differences in pupils Aware of classroom procedures Show understanding of behavior
management Initiates interaction with students Instruction Communicates Clearly and Accurately € Exhibits appropriate oral language usage € Exhibits appropriate written language usages € Exhibits appropriate voice projection Recognizes the importance of student
involvement Provides appropriate feedback to student
Displays sense of flexibility and
responsiveness Assists in classroom activities Professional Responsibilities/Personal Characteristics Demonstrates potential to grow and
develop professionally Shows active interest and willingness to
participate in classroom activities Has poise and confidence Indicates sense of responsibility and
dependability Exhibits good judgment, self-control and
tact Shows interest in students Presents a professional appearance Displays a positive attitude Wisconsin Teacher Standards Note: Standards 4,5,7,8,9 and 10 are not
evaluated in this experience 1. Knows the subjects they are teaching.
2. Knows how children grow. 3. Understands that children learn
differently. 6. Communicates well. |
|
Please make additional comments concerning information you have indicated on the reverse side of this form.
prestudentcoopassess (OVER) 10/18/2004
Planning and Preparation Elements
The Classroom Environment
Instruction
Professional Responsibilities/Personal Characteristics
Wisconsin Teacher Standards
Signatures:
Cooperating Teacher_____________________________________________ Date______________
Student________________________________________________________ Date______________
Pre-Clinical Course Instructor______________________________________ Date______________
Please return this form to ____________________________________________ in the self-addressed postage paid envelope provided.
Appendix C
FCSE 201 Observation Log