Instructional Design for Online Learning Banner
 
 

Discussion Evaluation Rubric

Excellent
(5 points)
  • Discussion postings clearly indicate understanding of course readings and are completed before the deadline, meet or exceed the minimum number required, and are straight to the point, clearly worded, and respond constructively to others' ideas.
  • Discussion postings include thought-provoking questions or additional insights designed to elicit responses from other participants.
  • Clear evidence of critical analysis of a posted idea with no clear connections drawn to professional practice. 
  • Includes a wide variety of appropriate, researched and informative sources (or references course materials) to support ideas. Quotes and sources of information are credited appropriately.
  • Responses are posted to postings/questions of other participants and enhance the class discussion.
  • Enters discussion early enough in the module so as to return and add to the discussion in a timely manner.
  • Consistently responds to discussions in less than 48 hours; does not need prompting.
Adequate
(4 points)
  • Discussion postings are generally timely, relevant and include some feedback about the readings and include responses to others' comments in the discussions.
  • Meets the minimum number of postings per week.
  • Discussion postings include questions that move beyond yes or no answers, and elicit responses from other participants.
  • Some evidence of critical analysis of a posted idea with no clear connections drawn to professional practice. 
  • Does not include a wide variety of appropriate, researched and informative sources (or references course materials) to support ideas.
  • Respondent waits until the very end of the module to post, thereby not being able to fully engage in the ideas and discussion and/or occasionally needs prompting to responds within a 48 hour period.
Partially Proficient
(3 points)
  • Discussion postings do not fully speak to the prompts.
  • Posting's may address one element of a prompt, but fail to completely deal with the topic.
  • Discussion postings include questions that do not move beyond yes or no answers, and fail to elicit responses from other participants.
  • No inclusion of appropriate, researched and informative sources (or references course materials) to support ideas.
  • Little evidence of critical analysis of a posted idea with no clear connections drawn to professional practice. 
  • Late or so far at the end of the unit as to make no meaningful contribution.
  • Responds only occasionally to discussions.
Incomplete
(2 points)
  • Discussion postings are merely perfunctory. For example, many of the postings are "I think so too" or "I disagree" without elaboration of thinking, or there is excessive quoting from the readings without any significant supporting evidence of the topic.
  • Discussion postings include unclear questions that do not move beyond yes or no answers and/or fail to respond to classmates' postings.
  • No evidence of critical analysis of a posted idea with no clear connections drawn to professional practice. 
  • Late or so far at the end of the unit as to make no meaningful contribution.
  • Does not respond to discussions.

Late policy:

Work that is submitted within 1 week of the close of a module will be penalized one point. In other words, you need to be on time to earn 100% and have only one week to make up late work. Late work will not be accepted after 1 week unless previously approved by the instructor.

To get back to the previous page, click here: BACK.

 

 
 
© COPYRIGHT 2007 Susan Manning All Rights Reserved.
Logo design by Carlo Vergara
Last Updated: Thursday, May 8, 2008 5:42 AM
http://www.uwstout.edu/soe/profdev/instructonline